The essence of rule 34

[Aroukar]

@Illuminati 2.0 Pick a source, and show me what you think is the best rule 34 for it. Then, I'll show my pick, and we'll discuss the merits of each. It should be obvious, but anyone else is free to join in too.

 

[weedville]

This should get interesting

 

[ZZZandeRRR]

@Illuminati 2.0 Pick a source, and show me what you think is the best rule 34 for it. Then, I'll show my pick, and we'll discuss the merits of each. It should be obvious, but anyone else is free to join in too.

I like myself a good discussion/debate. Let's go for it.

 

[Aroukar]

Might become cringe, without a modicum of restraint.

 

[Aroukar]

I like myself a good discussion/debate. Let's go for it.

Go for it.

 

[ZZZandeRRR]

this isn't exactly rule 34 but I thought my cat looked nice in it.

Hot take, with the right artist any subject material can look good.

 

[Aroukar]

View attachment 47512this isn't exactly rule 34 but I thought my cat looked nice in it.

Hot take, with the right artist any subject material can look good.

That's what I was trying to impress on Illuminati; that anything can be good with the proper technique. Don't exactly have a comeback for an IRL cat. Here's another cat though.

 

[walter_spencer_1488]

View attachment 47512this isn't exactly rule 34 but I thought my cat looked nice in it.

Hot take, with the right artist any subject material can look good.

Aww ur cat is cutr

 

[walter_spencer_1488]

That's what I was trying to impress on Illuminati; that anything can be good with the proper technique. Don't exactly have a comeback for an IRL cat. Here's another cat though.
View attachment 47515

cat are cute

 

[TinFoilHatGuy]

 

[TinFoilHatGuy]

Maybe not quite following instructions

 

[Illuminati 2.0]

@Illuminati 2.0 Pick a source, and show me what you think is the best rule 34 for it. Then, I'll show my pick, and we'll discuss the merits of each. It should be obvious, but anyone else is free to join in too.

Here is rule 34 itself

It seems like the best source found on the wiki

 

[Aroukar]

View attachment 47541View attachment 47542

So my question is: Was it the artist's intention to portray this sensually, or did they do just to satisfy rule 34? It's probably the latter, but if anyone finds this arousing, then the former could be true as well.

 

[Illuminati 2.0]

So my question is: Was it the artist's intention to portray this sensually, or did they do just to satisfy rule 34? It's probably the latter, but if anyone finds this arousing, then the former could be true as well.

It was probably a humorous take on the essence of what rule 34 is. It wasnt supposed to be sexual it was just to satisfy rule 34

 

[Aroukar]

It was probably a humorous take on the essence of what rule 34 is. It wasnt supposed to be sexual it was just to satisfy rule 34

I agree. It wasn't supposed to be, but now it is. It's nature has changed. That's why I don't understand why some people get upset when their favorite characters get depicted in lascivious situations. They're not the same character anymore. Firstly, because it is usually not sanctioned art by the original creator. Secondly, said subjects might be engaging in behavior that contradicts their characters.

Here's an example:

The character depicted above is apparently a lesbian from League of Legends. Why was this drawn?

 

[Illuminati 2.0]

I agree. It wasn't supposed to be, but now it is. It's nature has changed. That's why I don't understand why some people get upset when their favorite characters get depicted in lascivious situations. They're not the same character anymore. Firstly, because it is usually not sanctioned art by the original creator. Secondly, said subjects might be engaging in behavior that contradicts their characters.

Here's an example:

The character depicted above is apparently a lesbian from League of Legends. Why was this drawn?

Because furries and fantards are sick fucks

 

[Aroukar]

Because furries and fantards are sick fucks

An oversimplification. You could argue that we live in a highly fetishized society, where kinky is normal, and normal is becoming kinky.

 

[TinFoilHatGuy]

So my question is: Was it the artist's intention to portray this sensually, or did they do just to satisfy rule 34? It's probably the latter, but if anyone finds this arousing, then the former could be true as well.

I would ask one simple question... is anything sexier than chocolate? LoL, I dunno.....

 

[benos]

 

[ZZZandeRRR]

View attachment 47541View attachment 47542

Bruh is this bitch Santa cause she is a HoHo hoe

 

[walter_spencer_1488]

View attachment 47604

lolwut

 

[ZZZandeRRR]

lolwut

CHICKEN BREASTS

 

[walter_spencer_1488]

CHICKEN BREASTS

Chicken Fortress 2

 

[walter_spencer_1488]

Chicken Fortress 2

@weedville stop saying kill yourself maggot!

 

[ZZZandeRRR]

@weedville stop saying kill yourself maggot!

 

[walter_spencer_1488]

View attachment 47609

That is a high quality shoop

 

[Illuminati 2.0]

An oversimplification. You could argue that we live in a highly fetishized society, where kinky is normal, and normal is becoming kinky.

Find a more in depth image with a message

 

[.wil]

why is 3 afraid of 4?

 

[benos]

Because your mom.

 

[Aroukar]

why is 3 afraid of 4?

What was the first example of rule 34?